
POLICE-COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
This research forecasted the outmoded nature of arrest-based policing and strictly adversarial relations between police and community, both built on the criminal-trial model of justice.
​
Citizen review boards (CRBs) use community leaders as a legitimate oversight mechanism for police complaints. But because they act as criminal courts that do not have binding power, CRBs are largely resisted by police.
​
Meanwhile, the "community policing" strategy attempts to build close relationships between police and citizen. The problem with this strategy is officers continue to be evaluated for promotion based on arrest numbers.
​
The police-community partnership proposes that CRBs channel the voice of the community in commending community-friendly officers and that police departments use this input in promoting officers. Through this approach, CRBs would punish the bad cops by promoting the good cops.
​
To learn more, email nate@outsideinnovation.org.

CRBs are groups of civilians who review police complaints, using a criminal court approach to punish bad officer behavior.

Civilians acting as a criminal court without the expertise or power to judge officers only draw resistance from police.

If departments use CRB input in giving promotions, officers would have community-friendly incentives.

CRBs are groups of civilians who review police complaints, using a criminal court approach to punish bad officer behavior.